|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GuaranteesIf the property already has the benefit of guarantees for damp-proofing,
timber or other treatments, then we should receive copies of those
guarantees from the Sellers solicitors with the Contract.
We should also receive notification from them as to whether or not
any defects have arisen under the terms of those guarantees and
if so when, how and what remedial work (if any) was carried out
as a result. Please remember, however, that the existence of a guarantee
and the fact that no claim has been made under it, does not mean
that the property is free from defect. The guarantee may have expired
or be close to expiring. Only part of the property may be covered
by it or the guarantee may cover only some risks/defects and not
others. Some guarantees do not provide cover to successive purchasers
of the property and sometimes when claims are made guarantees are
found to be invalid or the provider of these guarantee cannot be
traced.
SurveysWhilst in commercial property transactions it is still the practice of Buyers Solicitors to raise enquiries of the Sellers Solicitors as to the structural soundness of the property or the condition of its services and appliances, sellers invariably decline to answer such enquiries and invite the Buyer to rely on his or its own survey and inspection. These are matters upon which you should satisfy yourselves by means of professional surveys, personal inspection and/or direct questioning of the Sellers. Accordingly, we very strongly recommend that you enquire specifically of the Sellers whether or not they are aware of any such matters as structural defects, subsidence, drainage, mechanical, electrical or plumbing defects, dry or wet rot, rising damp or woodworm, although that list is not exhaustive. You should never lose sight of the fact that the doctrine of caveat emptor or let the Buyer beware applies and that there is no obligation on the Sellers to disclose defects to you. So far as the services are concerned (particularly things like air conditioning, lifts, cranes, alarm systems and the central heating system) you should ensure that these are all in full working order by requesting the Sellers to operate them in your presence or that of your surveyor. If you or your surveyor are at all concerned then you should make arrangements for appropriate tests to be carried out by a qualified expert or Contractor. The same applied to the electrical system at the property, which you should have tested by a qualified electrician if you are at all dubious about its condition. If it becomes clear, either from your own inspection and enquiries or following the results of professional surveys or tests that the property does suffer from any defects then we shall, of course, be happy to pursue these matters on your behalf with the Sellers solicitors. These checks on the physical condition of the property must, however, be carried out at an early stage since once you have signed and exchanged contracts it will be too late to back out of the transaction or seek any price reduction for defects discovered afterwards. It is essential even if you are a cash buyer and do not require a mortgage, to obtain a full Structural Survey Report. If you are obtaining a mortgage to buy the property the lender will arrange a Valuation Report to ensure that the property values up for mortgage lending purposes. Even though (in most cases) you will be asked to pay for that valuation, and you may even be shown a copy of it by the lender, you cannot legally rely on it. The valuers legal duty of care is to the lender and does not extend to you. It is not a detailed or thorough examination of the structure, services or appliances and you will have no legal remedy against the valuer or the lender if it fails to disclose defects in the property. A valuation and survey are entirely and completely different. We, therefore, very strongly recommend that you obtain your own full independent Structural Survey report from a qualified Surveyor on which you can rely. If your Surveyor fails to notice a material defect in the property, or to bring it to your attention, you may be able to sue the Surveyor for negligence and recover damages equal to the cost of any necessary remedial work to put the defect right. The Surveyor will have professional indemnity insurance to cover any such claim. Most Surveyors will qualify their report and their liability to you by stating for example, that they have not inspected inaccessible parts of the property or tested all the services or appliances and will suggest that you obtain additional specialists reports from electrical, plumbing/heating, cavity wall tie, damp-proof and other experts. If you do not follow up that advice you will be unable to hold the Surveyor himself responsible for any defects which would have been revealed as a result. Some specialists reports, particularly from damp-proofing and wood treatment experts, can be obtained free of charge. We will be happy to advise you on this if you wish. These should, however, be seen as supplemental to and not a replacements for a full independent Structural Survey. We have contact with a number of independent professionally qualified chartered Surveyors who will be able to carry out a full Structural Survey on your behalf. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require advice as to which Surveyor to instruct or the likely cost of so doing.
Contaminated LandPlease note the possibility that the property you intend to buy (including on a long leasehold basis) has been built on contaminated land, of which there is estimated to be more than half a million acres in the UK. This is a particular risk when purchasing a commercial property constructed on or near a former industrial site, sometimes referred to as brown land. Apart from the intrinsic health risks, owners may find themselves legally liable for substantial clean up costs (for example top soil replacement or chemical treatment) if the original polluter and original builder/developer cannot be traced or have ceased to exist. Whilst Local Authorities are now obliged (with effect from Summer 1999) to begin the creation of a local register of contaminated land, the results of which will in due course be disclosed in Local Searches, it will be another ten to fifteen years before all contaminated land has been identified and registered as such. Buildings insurance is unlikely to cover environmental clean up costs because the pollution/contamination will have long preceded the policys inception. We always raise environmental enquiries of the Seller on your behalf before exchange of Contracts. These cover the sites history and previous usage (so far as the Seller is aware), whether an environmental survey has been previously undertaken and whether (and if so what) decontamination work has been undertaken. However, such enquiries are unlikely to illicit an informed or accurate reply. In these circumstances we recommend, in all cases, that as a minimum a desk top environmental search be commissioned against the property. We can obtain this on your behalf and will provide quotations on request. The report provides details on the environmental setting and previous land use, incorporates current and historic ordnance survey mapping which contains environmental data from numerous statutory and non-statutory sources including the Environment Agency, British Geographical Survey and the local planning department. Please confirm to us by return whether we are or are not to commission an environmental desk top search on your behalf. If you do not instruct us to obtain such a report and it later transpires the premises are contaminated (whether or not the cost of putting this right falls upon you) and a search would have put you on notice of this, the responsibility will be yours and you must sign and return to us the attached waiver. Whilst a desk top search result is likely to identify problem sites, a clear result, ie a ‘Passed’ certificate from a specialist environmental surveyor, is no guarantee that the property is free from contamination and only a comprehensive expert analysis of the site (including the taking of soil samples) the cost of which will be substantial, would provide a definitive result. Please note that we are not experts in advising upon whether a property is or may be contaminated, this being outside our responsibility and retainer. We will however refer you to specialist environmental consultants if you wish to instruct them and/or, insurers who specialise in the insurance of actually or potentially contaminated land against the cost of compliance with remediation notices served by the Local Authority or Environment Agency
InsuranceIt is your responsibility (unless you are quite sure this has been arranged for you by your mortgage lender) to arrange buildings insurance cover from exchange of Contracts. That cover should be for the full reinstatement value of the property if it is wholly destroyed and may well exceed, given the cost of demolition and rebuilding and professional fees, the actual purchase price. If an investment property is being acquired subject to business tenancies the cover should extend to loss of rent and the perils/risks insured against must correspondence with those set out in the Lease(s). Again, we will be happy to give you advice on this on this point if you require it. We recommend that you re-inspect the property immediately before Contracts are exchanged to ensure it is in the same condition as when you first inspected it. If any damage has occurred you must make arrangements with the Sellers for repairs to be carried out as your insurance will only provide cover from the date the policy goes on risk.
Stamp Duty Land TaxBackground “Stamp Duty” has existed since 1694 as a government tax on certain legal documents, including transfers of land. In the past, rates of duty were low (usually one percent) and the legislation for levying this relatively simple tax, collected via the legal profession using a single sheet form, mostly took care of itself – the 1891 Stamp Act survived the 20th century with only minor amendments. The SDLT compliance procedure is much more onerous and complex than the old one. The Finance Act 2003 replaced Stamp Duty with SDLT on 1st December 2003. It is a tax on transactions, not documents, which are no longer physically sent in to the Inland Revenue and ‘stamped’.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||